Review
Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: Neurodevelopment or neurodegeneration? An ECNP expert meeting report

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

This is a report arising from an ECNP expert meeting. Recent studies have focussed on cognitive problems in manic-depressive illness and a few have addressed premorbid neuropsychological functioning. The results are not fully consistent but seem to point to a neurodegenerative model, rather than a neurodevelopmental one, for some cognitive domains. There is agreement that cognitive dysfunction is highly correlated with psychosocial functioning. The neurobiological and clinical implications of recent findings will be discussed. Treatments to reduce subsyndromal symptoms and relapses may indirectly improve neurocognitive deficits and this should be better documented. Moreover, neurocognitive impairment in bipolar disorder should be considered a potential therapeutic target, so that research should focus on new drugs and psychological interventions, including neurocognitive rehabilitation, addressed to improve not only the cognition but also the functional outcome of this population.

Introduction

There is a broad consensus that patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders have cognitive impairments when, compared with age matched controls of similar educational background (Bearden et al., 2001, Quraishi and Frangou, 2002). Furthermore, these impairments appear to be somewhat independent of affective state, as they are present in euthymic or symptom free individuals (Martinez-Aran et al., 2004b, Robinson et al., 2006). The cognitive domains that appear to be most consistently impaired are: attention, memory and executive function (Quraishi and Frangou, 2002). On average, the magnitudes of the detected effects are between, on average, 0.2 to 1 standard deviation unit (Thompson et al., 2005, Robinson et al., 2006) and they are, broadly speaking, smaller than those seen for cohorts with schizophrenia of a similar age (Martinez-Aran et al., 2002). A recent meta-analysis found moderate to large effect sizes in most neurocognitive measures especially on verbal memory, attention/processing speed and executive functions (Torres et al., 2007). In a two-year follow-up study by Mur et al. (2008), euthymic bipolar patients showed a poorer neurocognitive performance between − 1 and− 2 SD compared to healthy controls on executive function and processing speed measures.

However, it would be wrong to say that there exists an obvious pattern of impairment that specifically characterizes bipolar disorder, although some studies have sought to define differences from schizophrenia or psychosis (Clark et al., 2005b, Glahn et al., 2006, Glahn et al., 2007). However, the cause(s), consequences and potential prevention of cognitive impairments in bipolar disorder are of great contemporary interest. Of particular importance is the nature of these impairments and how they may inform us about the aetiology of bipolar disorder. The primary aim of this review is to determine if the current literature can address the following question. Specifically, are cognitive impairments found in bipolar patients more consistent with neurodevelopmental or neurodegenerative disorders?

Section snippets

Evidence of neurodevelopmental pathology?

Clearly the preferred approach to understanding neuropsychological differences from normal controls would be a prospective study starting in childhood. Since there exist several large cohorts of children followed up to adulthood, some of whom develop psychiatric disorders, limited small scale studies of this kind have been described. Thus, the Dunedin study found generally superior rather than impaired function in some domains for children who subsequently grew up to have bipolar disorder (

Evidence of neurodegenerative pathology?

Whatever the abnormalities that may exist either before the onset of illness or in first-degree relatives, there is a general consensus that those abnormalities seen in patients with established bipolar disorder are more severe and affect a greater number of cognitive domains. Could this be an expression of neurodegeneration? In other words, is there a loss of function and an underlying functional neuropathology subsequent to the onset of bipolar disorder? The major confound for the many cross

Cross sectional clinical studies

A number of studies have described an association between intensity of illness history and current cognitive impairment in the memory and executive domains, independent of current symptoms (Cavanagh et al., 2002., Clark et al., 2002, Martinez-Aran et al., 2004a, Bearden et al., 2006). This has also been consistently reported in recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews (Robinson et al., 2006, Torres et al., 2007). Some authors analysed differences on neurocognitive performance between first-

Longitudinal clinical studies

There are few follow-up studies on neurocognition in bipolar disorder longer than one year. A 3 year follow-up study comparing schizophrenic and bipolar patients suggested that both patient groups were more impaired in several neuropsychological measures than the healthy controls (Balanza-Martinez et al., 2005). Cognitive deficits persisted in the long term not only in schizophrenic but also in bipolar patients, but controls were only assessed once and samples size was small. A four year

Cross sectional neuroimaging studies

Structural imaging studies are complementary to, if usually less sensitive than neuropsychology. They have also usually adopted a cross sectional design, comparing patients with controls. In a meta-analysis, only right ventricular enlargement was consistently found in bipolar patients (McDonald et al., 2004). Although the literature contains several non-replications (McDonald et al., 2004), there is increasing evidence for medialtemporal (e.g. enlarged amygdala) and prefrontal (e.g. reduced

Longitudinal neuroimaging studies

The hypothesis that illness progression can produce cognitive impairment and relevant structural change can only be proved by prospective studies. In one of the first of its kind, a 4 year follow-up study of patients and age matched controls suggested a reduction in memory function and loss of gray matter volume in medial temporal cortex related to illness intensity (Moorhead et al., 2007). This is the strongest evidence that we have to date in favour of a direct correlation between the illness

The effects of medication

Finally, there must always be concerns that polypharmacy, especially when sedative medicines are used in high doses. Such medications may contribute to the cognitive impairments observed in cross sectional studies of bipolar disorder. To date, there has not been a cohort of patients with a really severe illness history who could be studied drug free. The forgoing evidence is against this being the exclusive explanation for why patients with bipolar disorder have impaired cognitive function, but

Clinical implications

The consequences of cognitive impairment are of functional significance (Martinez-Aran et al., 2002, Martinez-Aran et al., 2007, Jaeger and Vieta, 2007) There are clearly confounds of depression and previous illness intensity as already described. However, it seems reasonable to suppose, and it is certainly sometimes confirmed by patients themselves, that memory and concentration can be a limiting factor in their returning to demanding executive work. Indeed it would be very surprising if this

Conclusions

The lack of strong evidence for cognitive impairment prior to illness onset in bipolar disorder appears to be inconsistent with classically defined neurodegenerative illness causation. However, there is evidence for minor impairment of executive processes in unaffected adult relatives. Neurodegeneration may or may not be the correct term for the deleterious effects of repeated episodes and neurotrophic medications on cognitive performance. Evidence for accelerated cognitive decline in bipolar

Role of the funding source

The ECNP provided funding for the Targeted Expert Meeting held in Vienna, October 12 2007, from which this report has been delivered.

Contributors

All the authors have been sufficiently involved in the study submitted.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declares no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The support of the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto Carlos III, CIBER de Salud Mental. One of the authors (AMA) is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto Carlos III through a “Miguel Servet” postdoctoral contract.

References (62)

  • KasperS. et al.

    Cognitive effects and antipsychotic treatment

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2003)
  • McDonaldC. et al.

    Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging brain morphometry studies in bipolar disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • McIntoshA.M. et al.

    White matter density in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and their unaffected relatives

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • MoorheadT.W. et al.

    Progressive gray matter loss in patients with bipolar disorder.

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • NehraR. et al.

    Comparison of cognitive functions between first-and multi-episode bipolar affective disorders

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2006)
  • NicholsN.R. et al.

    Glucocorticoid regulation of glial responses during hippocampal neurodegeneration and regeneration

    Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.

    (2005)
  • QuraishiS. et al.

    Neuropsychology of bipolar disorder: a review

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2002)
  • RobinsonL.J. et al.

    A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

    J. Affect Disord.

    (2006)
  • RosaA.R. et al.

    Predominant polarity in bipolar disorder: Diagnostic implications

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2008)
  • YusimA. et al.

    Glucocorticoids exacerbate insult-induced declines in metabolism in selectively vulnerable hippocampal cell fields

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • AlbusM. et al.

    Contrasts in neuropsychological test profile between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and first-episode affective disorders

    Acta Psychiatr. Scand.

    (1996)
  • ArtsB. et al.

    Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives

    Psychol. Med.

    (2007)
  • Balanza-MartinezV. et al.

    Persistent cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar I disorder and schizophrenic patients: a 3-year follow-up study

    Psychother. Psychosom.

    (2005)
  • BeardenC.E. et al.

    The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review

    Bipolar Disord.

    (2001)
  • BurdickK.E. et al.

    Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: future place of pharmacotherapy

    CNS Drugs

    (2007)
  • CannonM. et al.

    Premorbid social functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: similarities and differences

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • CavanaghJ.T. et al.

    Case-control study of neurocognitive function in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder: an association with mania

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • ClarkL. et al.

    Sustained attention deficit in bipolar disorder

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • ClarkL. et al.

    Impairment of executive function but not memory in first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar I disorder and in euthymic patients with unipolar depression

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • ConusP. et al.

    Pharmacological treatment in the early phase of bipolar disorders: what stage are we at?

    Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • FerrierI.N. et al.

    Neuropsychological function in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • Cited by (147)

    • Visual electrophysiology and neuropsychology in bipolar disorders: A review on current state and perspectives

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      This may be due to a difficulty in assessing deficits, which would be linked to a lack of agreement in the literature on defining a specific deficit profile. In addition, many confounding factors may cause the results to vary, as may be the case with comorbidities, treatments, or clinical variables (Goodwin et al., 2008). Variability of cognitive impairments appears to be significantly related to clinical heterogeneity and mood state and in parallel, bipolar clinical subtype seems to influence cognitive outcome (Bora, 2018; Martinez-Aran et al., 2007).

    • Neurodevelopmental pathways in bipolar disorder

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text